Andwan v. Eichert
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 267
Syllabus
Civ.R. 60(B) — MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT — ABUSE OF DISCRETION: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff's Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment where the plaintiff failed to present any argument as to why she was entitled to relief under any specific provision of Civ.R. 60(B)(1) through (5) and failed to assert any rationale for her delay in filing the motion until well over a year after final judgment.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[t]here is less risk of prejudice when a defense witness other than the defendant is impeached through a prior conviction because the jury cannot directly infer the defendant’s guilt from someone else’s criminal record”
- noting that “[t]here is less risk of prejudice when a defense witness other than the defendant is impeached through a prior conviction because the jury cannot directly infer the defendant’s guilt from someone else’s criminal record”
- drawing a connection between credibility and crimes involving a “conscious disregard for the rights of others”
- “There is less risk of prejudice when a defense witness other than the defendant is impeached through a 10 prior conviction because the jury cannot directly infer the defendant’s guilt from someone else’s criminal record.”
- distinguishing between the probative values of different types of crimes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Zayas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.