S.D. New York· 12/9/1986
Andujar v. Rogowski
Citations
- 113 F.R.D. 151
- 6 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1066
- 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16761
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allowing the relation back of new plaintiffs’ claims that were identical to the original claims
- effective formal notice is achieved by identifiable statement of factual basis, legal issues involved in plaintiff’s claim
- “As long as defendant is fully apprised of a claim arising from specific conduct and has prepared to defend the actions against him, he will not be prejudiced by the addition of a new plaintiff.”
- allow ing additions of new plaintiff and new liability to relate back
- actual notice outside institution of original suit may satisfy Rule 15(c)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ward
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Warren v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana· 2009-06-26· cited 49×
- Neufeld v. NeufeldS.D. New York· 1996-01-23· cited 49×
- Charlot v. Ecolab, Inc.E.D. New York· 2015-03-27· cited 43×
- In re Nyse Specialists Securities LitigationS.D. New York· 2007-02-26· cited 33×
- Atlantis Plastics Corp. v. SammonsCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1989-01-03· cited 21×
- Cortigiano v. Oceanview Manor Home for AdultsE.D. New York· 2005-04-04· cited 21×
- In Re Joint Eastern & Southern Districts Asbestos LitigationS.D. New York· 1992-07-28· cited 19×
- Crossland Savings FSB v. Rockwood InsuranceS.D. New York· 1988-12-05· cited 18×
- Erickson v. Wright Welding Supply, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1992-05-13· cited 18×
- Neuner v. C.G. Realty Capital Ventures-I, L.P. (In Re Sharps Run Associates, L.P.)D. New Jersey· 1993-08-13· cited 14×
- Page v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.District of Columbia· 1990-03-28· cited 11×
- Ross v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1989-03-02· cited 6×
- Mathis v. BessS.D. New York· 1991-03-28· cited 5×
- Buttram v. CENTRAL STATES HEALTH & WELFARE FUNDE.D. Missouri· 1992-01-28· cited 1×
- Arce Bucetta v. Motorola Electrónica de Puerto Rico, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2008-04-09
- Arce Bucetta v. Motorola Electrónica De P.R.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 2008-04-09
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.