Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 3/31/2008

Andrus v. United States

Citations

  • 128 S. Ct. 1738
  • 552 U.S. 1297
  • 76 U.S.L.W. 3528
  • 170 L. Ed. 2d 542
  • 2008 U.S. LEXIS 3083

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ‘‘[t]he [United States] Supreme Court and this circuit have both expressly held that acquitted con- duct can be considered for purposes of sentencing’’ (emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.