Andrus v. Nicholson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• awarding attorney fees under I.C. § 12-121 because appellants “did not address on appeal the grounds upon which the district court granted the [respondents’] motion for summary judgment”
• claim preclusion bars all claims “which might and should have been litigated in the first suit”
• “[C]laim preclusion under the doctrine of res judicata is not limited to theories that were actually litigated in the prior lawsuit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).