Andrus v. Harman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the party must “affirmatively place[] the subject matter of its own privileged communication at issue in litigation”
• explaining that the party must “affirmatively place[] the subject matter of its own privileged communication at issue in litigation”
• denying request for disclosure of communications protected by attorney-client privilege where those communications would not be used as evidence
• denying request for disclosure of communications protected by attorney-client privilege where those communications would not be used as evidence
• declining to address breach of fiduciary duty claim because it was duplicative of legal malpractice claim, where claims were premised on same conduct and sought identical relief
• “[T]he question in at-issue waiver cases is not simply whether the requested information is relevant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).