Skip to main content
· 4/24/1989

Andrus v. Bagley

Citations

  • 775 P.2d 934
  • 107 Utah Adv. Rep. 3
  • 1989 Utah LEXIS 32
  • 1989 WL 64611

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because the plaintiff “had no interest, he had no standing to bring the action”
  • “The purpose of a quiet title action is to perfect an interest in property that exists at the time suit is filed.”
  • “The purpose of a quiet title action is to perfect an interest in property that exists at the time suit is filed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Hall, Howe, Durham, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.