Skip to main content
· 11/12/2004

Andrukiewicz v. Andrukiewicz

Citations

  • 860 A.2d 235
  • 2004 R.I. LEXIS 175
  • 2004 WL 2578099

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the plaintiff failed to preserve defense of laches for appellate review where the plaintiff failed to raise it before the trial justice
  • stating that a fundamental principle of contract interpretation requires that an interpretation that reduces certain words of a contract to mere surplusage should be rejected
  • stating that every word of a contract should be given meaning and effect; an interpretation that reduces certain words to the status of surplusage should be rejected
  • “When ascertaining the usual and ordinary meaning of contractual language, every word of the contract should be given meaning and effect; an interpretation that reduces certain words to the status of sur-plusage should be rejected.”
  • discussing standard for interpreting property settlement agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams, Goldberg, Suttell, Robinson, Flaherty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.