Andropolis v. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• taking note of plaintiffs’ allegation that employer 11 “permitted . . . workers [at a refinery] to perform unpaid pre-shift work routines, including 12 donning personal protective gear, gathering equipment and tools, and traveling to their work 13 sites”
• company’s mandatory adoption of a code of ethics does not imply that all directors and officers are adhering to the code, and omission of violations does not render the statement of adoption misleading

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).