Andrija Artukovic v. Richard H. Rison, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “statements contained in properly authenticated documents can constitute competent evidence to support a certificate of extradition”
• stating that “[t]he scope of habeas review of an 3 extradition order is severely limited”
• finding that a petitioner satisfied the irreparable harm factor because if the petitioner’s stay 24 motion was denied, the petitioner’s “appeal will become moot and will be dismissed since the 1 extradition will have been carried out”
• granting a motion to stay the extradition of the movant from the United States to another country pending appeal
• finding 13 that a petitioner satisfied the irreparable harm factor because if the petitioner’s 14 stay motion was denied, the petitioner’s appeal will become moot and will be 15 dismissed since [the petitioner’s] extradition will have been carried out
• “The possibility of irreparable injury to [Petitioner] if we deny his motion is evident: his appeal will become moot and will be dismissed since the extradition will have been carried out.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).