· 8/26/2019

Andrews v. Youngstown

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 3676

Syllabus

On requester's objection to a special master's report and recommendation (R&R), the court overruled the objection, adopted the R&R, found that requester's claim for production of records was moot, and found that respondent failed to provide the requested records within a reasonable period of time. Absent an objection by the requester or respondent to the special master's recommendation to apportion costs equally between the parties, the court assessed court costs equally against the requester and respondent.

Judges: McGrath

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.