Skip to main content
· 6/23/1970

Andrews v. Struble

Citations

  • 178 N.W.2d 391
  • 1970 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 843

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding repetition not proper but permitted when “of some aid in clarifying the requirement of proximate cause”
  • “When an improper remark is made by counsel in the course of jury argument, it is the duty of the party aggrieved to timely voice objection.”
  • “When an improper remark is made by counsel in the course of jury argument, it is the duty of the party aggrieved to timely voice objection.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mason

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.