Andrews v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that because the key word is not otherwise specifically in the subject criminal statute, it “must be given its common, or dictionary, definition”
• noting that words in the criminal code should be given their common meaning unless otherwise defined
• Because the key word is not otherwise specifically in the subject criminal statute, it “must be given its common, or dictionary, definition.”
• Because a key word was not otherwise specifically defined in the subject statute, it “must be given its common, or dictionary, definition.”
• Because a key word was not otherwise specifically defined in the subject statute, it “must be given its common, or dictionary, definition.”
• Because the key word is not otherwise specifically in the subject criminal statute, it “must be given its common, or dictionary, definition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Daniels
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2019-12-16
• State v. Jones
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2022-07-20
• State v. Palmer
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2022-11-03
• State v. Smith
  Superior Court of Delaware· 2025-06-10
• United Atlantic Ventures, LLC v. TMTG Sub Inc. f/k/a Trump Media & Technology Group Corp.
  Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2025-09-02

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Maddrey v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2009-06-15· cited 15×