Andrews v. Saylor Ex Rel. Estate of Scarborough

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that proximate cause determinations in legal malpractice actions are generally questions of fact and rejecting the idea that a jury cannot determine whether a hypothetical appeal would succeed
• holding that “in a legal malpractice action, the issue of proximate cause is a question of fact for the jury, and this is so even when proximate cause depends upon whether or not an appeal would have been successful”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).