Andrews v. Powell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when the defrauded plaintiff did not accept an amendment offered by the party who defrauded him, his right to sue for damages remained intact
• holding that when the defrauded plaintiff did not accept an amendment offered by the party who defrauded him, his right to sue for damages remained intact
• observing that \[a]cts done in affirmance of the original contract do not necessarily constitute waiver of the right of action for damages.\
• observing that “[a]cts done in affirmance of the original contract do not necessarily constitute waiver of the right of action for damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).