Andrews v. Paratransit

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• appli- cant’s changing story about his visa application process sup- ported the adverse credibility determination
• appli- cant’s changing story about his visa application process sup- ported the adverse credibility determination
• appli- cant’s changing story about his visa application process sup- ported the adverse credibility determination
• appli- cant’s changing story about his visa application process sup- ported the adverse credibility determination
• it was asylum applicant’s burden to authenticate documents; no error in refusing to let applicant submit more documents to corroborate testimony after immigration judge found initial round of documents “wanting”
• inconsistencies in story not “earthshaking,” but provided substantial evidence for credibility determination nonetheless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).