Skip to main content
· 3/12/1997

Andrews v. Diamond, Rash, Leslie & Smith

Citations

  • 959 S.W.2d 646
  • 1997 WL 48293

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting basis for estoppel is the assertion of a position clearly inconsistent with a previous position accepted by the court
  • noting basis for estoppel is the assertion of a position clearly inconsistent with a previous position accepted by the court
  • noting basis for estoppel is the assertion of a position clearly inconsistent with a previous position accepted by the court
  • discussing estoppel and explaining the “invited error” doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barajas, Larsen, Chew

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.