Andrews v. Carter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that this Court has “joined federal courts in resolving doubts in favor of removing default in actions where large sums of money are involved in the suit”
• “Under Super. R. Civ. P. 55(c) the only showing required for removing [a] default was ‘good cause’ and not the ‘mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect’ showing which would have been demanded under Super. R. Civ. P. 60(b
• stating suspect legislative classifications include race, alienage, or national origin

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).