Andrews v. Burge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing conspiracy claim where plaintiff made “general allegations that all defendants conspired with all other defendants and everything alleged against one is alleged against all”
• “Judge Aspen was clearly correct in deciding that the duty to intervene applicable to police officers is not to be imposed on prosecutors.”
• prosecutor “acts within his core functions” when he evaluates evidence gathered by policy and takes statement from criminal defendant
• “In Illinois... a prosecutor does not have police powers, nor do prosecutors have command of police operations, though at times courts act as if they do.”
• “Decisions about what training to provide come under the immunity umbrella.”
• “Decisions about what training to provide come under the immunity umbrella.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).