Supreme Court of Vermont· 12/2/1975
Andrews v. Andrews
Citations
- 349 A.2d 239
- 134 Vt. 47
- 1975 Vt. LEXIS 327
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Civil contempt can be found where a party, though able, refuses to comply with a valid, specific court order.”
- “Civil contempt can be found where a party, though able, refuses to comply with a valid, specific court order.”
- failure to execute documents in accordance with final decree was civil contempt punishable by imprisonment after adequate hearing and opportunity to purge
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barney, Smith, Daley, Larrow, Billings
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hartt v. HarttSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1979-02-07· cited 35×
- Hunt v. HuntSupreme Court of Vermont· 1994-08-05· cited 26×
- Viskup v. ViskupSupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-12-18· cited 18×
- Matthews v. RileySupreme Court of Vermont· 1994-07-22· cited 16×
- Borozny v. PaineSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1980-02-15· cited 14×
- LAMBERT EX REL. ESTATE OF LAMBERT v. BeedeSupreme Court of Vermont· 2003-07-23· cited 8×
- Persons v. LehoeSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-12-09· cited 8×
- Office of Child Support Ex Rel. Stanzione v. StanzioneSupreme Court of Vermont· 2006-09-13· cited 6×
- Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-06-14· cited 4×
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Vermont· 2000-08-22· cited 4×
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Vermont· 1981-08-14· cited 3×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.