Andrews, Steven G. v. E.I. DuPont de Nemou

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that diversity jurisdiction was proper where the plaintiff’s complaint sought damages “in excess of $50,000” and alleged “severe and permanent” injuries
• including “lost wages (past and future)” when assessing the amount in controversy
• \A party gets one shot at asking the district court to alter or amend the judgment and then he must move forward with his appeal—at least in the ordinary case.\; the rare exception is when the district court, in ruling on a Rule 59(e

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).