Skip to main content
· 5/17/1995

Andrew Whelan v. Tyler Abell

Citations

  • 48 F.3d 1247
  • 310 U.S. App. D.C. 396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that Noerr-Pennington does not protect “knowing misrepresentations to state securities administrators and a federal court.”
  • holding that appellant waived its claim that its opponent had waived the protections of the Noerr-Pennington doctrine by failing to assert the opponent's waiver
  • holding that a movant who omits a theory from his Rule 50(a) motion waives the theory as the basis for a Rule 50(b) motion
  • holding that a movant who omits a theory from his Rule 50(a) motion waives the theory as the basis for a Rule 50(b) motion
  • holding that failure to assert an objection to a Rule 50(b) motion constitutes waiver of the objection
  • holding that the plaintiff would be prejudiced by vacating the default against one defendant following the completion of trial against two co-defendants, as the plaintiff would then be forced to try the case again

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wald, Williams, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.