Andrew Wallace, a/k/a Andrew Stanley v. The State of Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that whether consent to a search was voluntary is a question of fact, not law
• holding unconstitutional the unconscious or incapacitated driver provision of the state’s implied consent statute
• “drawing blood . . . constitutes a search under both the Federal and North Carolina Constitutions”
• “drawing blood . . . constitutes a search under both the Federal and North Carolina Constitutions.”
• “drawing blood . . . constitutes a search under both the Federal and North Carolina Constitutions”
• “drawing blood . . . constitutes a search under both the Federal and North Carolina Constitutions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).