Skip to main content
· 12/7/1981

Andrew W. Pettibone v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Warden of Oregon State Penitentiary, and James A. Redden, Attorney General of the State of Oregon

Citations

  • 666 F.2d 333
  • 32 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1669
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15457

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rule 4(a)(5) expressly requires that appellant seeking extension of time after expiration of initial 30-day period file formal motion requesting extension of time
  • rule 4(a)(5) expressly requires that appellant seeking extension of time after expiration of initial 30-day period file formal motion requesting extension of time
  • Rule 4(a)(5) expressly requires filing of separate motion for extension of time and language of Rule precludes court from remanding on theory that untimely notice of appeal might be considered motion for extension of time

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Chambers, Goodwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.