Andrew v. Forsythe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no actual injury or monetary loss where the plaintiff experienced an attempted fraudulent charge on his credit card which was ultimately not approved
• “Standing is the threshold question in every federal case, and implicates the Court’s subject matter jurisdiction.” (quotation omitted)
• finding no standing based on increased risk of future harm where plaintiff alleged that “fraudulent use of cards might not- be apparent for years” and did not allege any out of pocket costs resulting from data breach
• “[W]ithout allegations about how her cancelled credit card information lost value, [plaintiff] does not have standing on this ground.”
• rejecting argument that mitigation expenses confér standing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).