Andrew Rudolf Wulf v. State of Iowa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that invalid prior conviction may not be used, consistent with Sixth Amendment, to support either conviction or sentence in subsequent proceeding
• holding that invalid prior conviction may not be used, consistent with Sixth Amendment, to support either conviction or sentence in subsequent proceeding
• holding that conviction was void because defendant was not represented by counsel during trial and record did not reveal a waiver of the right to representation
• recognizing that a federal petition for the writ of habeas corpus permits only limited authority to review a state court’s evidentiary ruling
• recognizing that a federal petition for the writ of habeas corpus permits only limited authority to review a state court’s evidentiary ruling.
• concluding that a state court judgment indicating the defendant had appeared “in proper person” could not be the basis for applying a state recidivism statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).