Andrew P. Dzinglski v. Weirton Steel Corporation Retirement Committee of Weirton Steel Corporation Retirement Plan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant “was acting in its capacity as [the plaintiff’s] employer, not as a fiduciary, when it decided to discharge him”
• an employer acting as a plan administrator has two roles--employer and plan administrator--but is only a fiduciary with respect to its actions as plan administrator
• an employer acting as a plan administrator has two roles—employer and plan administrator—but is only a fiduciary with respect to its actions as plan administrator
• “Business decisions can still be made for business reasons, notwithstanding their collateral effect on prospective, contingent employee benefits.”
• an employer acting as a plan administrator has two roles--employer and plan administrator--but is only a fiduciary with respect to its actions as plan administrator
• an employer acting as a plan administrator has two roles — employer and plan administrator — but is only a fiduciary with respect to its actions as plan administrator

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).