Andrew Midlock, Jr. v. Apple Vacations West, Inc., Appeal Of: William J. Cremer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the first remand, because it establishes the law of the case, ‘may be revisited only when intervening events justify that step’” (citing Benson, 188 F.3d at 783)
• “[A] district court decision does not have stare decisis effect; it is not a precedent.”
• “[A] district court decision does not have stare decisis effect; it is not a precedent.”
• “[A] district court decision does not have stare decisis effect; it is not a precedent.”
• “[A] district court decision does not have stare decisis effect; it is not a precedent.”
• “[A] district court decision does not have stare decisis effect; it is not a precedent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).