Andrew M. Collaro, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo G. West, Jr., Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the veteran raised constitutional and statutory issues even though the VA only resolved factual issues in response to a vague notice of disagreement
• concluding that broad NOD conferred jurisdiction over “radix” of issues within
• noting that, in Ledford, the appellant’s NOD had “specifically identified and thus limited” the matter put into appellate status
• explaining that “the ef- fective date of the disability” is one of five elements to a veteran’s application for benefits
• explaining that disagreement between [] VA and the veteran over legal entitlement to a particular benefit may form the basis of an NOD
• remanding claim to Board for failure to consider arguments made to Board but unaddressed in decision on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).