Andrew Jenkins, Officially, Superintendent D.C. Public Schools v. Theresa M. Squillacote

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when a child would remain eligible under IDEA for at least eleven more years, there was a reasonable expectation that there would be more conflict over his educational needs
• holding that the superintendent’s challenge to an HOD was not moot, even though the school year had ended because the controversy was “capable of repetition, yet evading review”
• applying exception where “both litigants readily agreed that [the controversy] . . . is a recurring one”
• describing the contested legal question as “the degree of specificity required of the District in providing notice to parents under the IDEA”
• inquiry is not whether another placement may be “more appropriate or better able to serve the child”
• \the degree of specificity required of the District in providing notice to parents under the IDEA\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).