· 8/11/2014
Andrew Dwyer v. Cynthia Cappell
Citations
- 762 F.3d 275
- 112 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1140
- 2014 WL 3893001
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 15361
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “the takeaway[ ] [is] there exist different frameworks for analyzing restrictions on speech and disclosure requirements”
- describing but not relying on Zauderer’s preventing-deception criterion
- describing but not relying on Zauderer’s preventing-deception criterion
- describing but not relying on ZauderePs preventing-deception criterion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ambro, Hardiman, Greenaway
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.