Andrew Dennis Beal v. State of Arkansas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that in Shady Grove “the Justices in the majority did not even agree as to 9 the standards governing that inquiry” and that “[i]n this case, however, we need not wade into any 10 such issue”
• “Nevada tends to follow the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws (1971) in 26 determining choice-of-law questions involving contracts, and unjust enrichment is a quasi- 27 contractual claim in Nevada.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).