Andrew Cortez Crater v. George M. Galaza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 27 AEDPA violates neither the Suspension Clause nor the separation of powers doctrine
• holding that AEDPA 27 violates neither the Suspension Clause nor the separation of powers doctrine
• holding that the 23 AEDPA violates neither the Suspension Clause nor the separation of powers doctrine
• holding that the 28 AEDPA violates neither the Suspension Clause nor the separation of powers doctrine
• holding that the 27 AEDPA violates neither the Suspension Clause nor the separation of powers doctrine
• recognizing that if federal habeas relie 20 || depends on the resolution of a question left open by United States Supreme Court decisions, 21 ||relief is precluded under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).