Andrew Calloway v. City of Warner Robins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a general verdict makes it “impossible to determine which basis the jury actually relied upon” in reaching its determination
• recommending that jury instructions defining “reside” include the SMART Guidelines’ definition of “habitually lives”
• reversing a SORNA conviction because the jury instruction’s omission of “any reference to the thirty-day standard” “could lead a jury to find even in the 4 absence of intent that some lesser period is sufficient to satisfy the ‘habitually lives’ standard”
• “[D]ue to the instructional error we have identified, we cannot determine the basis for the jury’s verdict.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).