Andrew Bonin Richard Bonin v. Tour West, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is irreconcilably inconsistent for a jury to find that a defendant 2 Question 1 defined sexual harassment in terms of Title VII, asking whether Ms. Culp had proved that “Remington subjected her to a hostile work environment based on her sex (sexual harassment
• listing Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Ninth Circuit precedent that distinguish between objections made for special and general verdicts
• “If a party fails to object before the jury is discharged, he waives any future challenge to the inconsistency because his failure to make a timely objection deprives the court of the option of sending the jury back for further deliberations.”
• “Rule 49(a) does not require a party to object to the inconsistencies in the jury’s answers to a special verdict before the jury is discharged in order to preserve his right to challenge the inconsistencies in a subsequent motion or on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).