Andrew Berman v. Fortress Investment Group LLC, C.A. No. 2023-0611-SG

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \absent such a clear statement ... courts should treat [a statutory timeliness requirement] as nonjurisdictional in character\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding that a provision was not jurisdictional because it lacked “the mandatory word ‘shall’ ”
• concluding that a 180-day time limit for filing a request for hearing before an administrative body was not jurisdictional
• holding that statutory deadline for internal agency appeal, subject to a regulatory exception under rulemaking authority, could not be equitably tolled
• holding that Congress need not “incant magic words in order to speak clearly” in the jurisdictional context
• holding that the filing deadline for administrative appeal from a denial of certain Medicare reimbursements is not a jurisdictional bar to appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).