Andrew Bamidele Bull v. Immigration and Naturalization Service an Agency of the United States Department of Justice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the fact that [a] petition for an immigrant visa had not yet been approved at 9 the time that [the petitioner] requested a continuance [is] not, in and of itself, sufficient reason to 10 deny the continuance.”
• holding denial of continuance to be an abuse of discretion
• “[The] denial of the request for a continuance based upon the conclusion that Bull’s guilty plea ma[de] him statutorily ineligible for adjustment of status would not be an abuse of discretion were that conclusion correct.”
• “[The] denial of the request for a continuance based upon the 12 conclusion that Bull’s guilty plea ma[de] him statutorily ineligible for adjustment of status would 13 not be an abuse of discretion were that conclusion correct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).