Skip to main content

Andrew B. v. Abbie B.

Citations

  • 494 P.3d 522

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that engaged parties tend to consider mutual interest instead of self-interest when executing prenuptial agreements
  • “explaining that prenuptial agreements must meet certain standards of fairness and that the” inquiry into fairness is both procedural –– whether the agreement was freely entered into –– and substantive –– whether the terms of the agreement are unconscionable
  • stating marriage itself is consideration in prenuptial agreement, not adequacy of contract’s provisions
  • “[T]he superior court may consider whether [a prenuptial agreement] was unconscionable when executed or whether circumstances have changed, making enforcement unfair and unreasonable.”
  • procedural fairness looks at whether the agreement was freely entered into

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.