Andrew A. Kendall v. Overseas Development Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, James A. Gershman, David Garst

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal because of issue preclusion where plaintiff had not pleaded new facts “that would support a different result on the issue of jurisdiction”
• “Comparing the pleadings in both the state and federal courts indicates that [the plaintiff] did not make any new allegations in the federal court that would support a result different from that in the state court.”
• “[A] dismissal for lack of in personam jurisdiction is not res judicata as to the merits of the claim.”
• “[A] dismissal for lack of in personam jurisdiction is not res judicata as to the merits of the claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).