Andres Serrano Medina v. United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an eleventh-hour amendment that would require extensive additional discovery would be prejudicial to the defendants
• \To delve into the truth or falsity of the facts behind the exclusion would be to require the very hearing that appellant has been found not entitled to.\
• “To delve into the truth or falsity of the facts behind the exclusion would be to require the very hearing that appellant has been found not entitled to.”
• “To delve into the truth or falsity of the facts behind the exclusion would be to require the very hearing that appellant has been found not entitled to.”
• possible exception for the exercise of first amendment rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).