Skip to main content
· 9/11/2006

Andres Amaya-Artunduaga v. U.S. Atty. Gen.

Citations

  • 463 F.3d 1247
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 23156
  • 2006 WL 2589713

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that this Court lacks jurisdiction over unexhausted arguments even if the BIA addresses them sua sponte
  • holding that we lack jurisdiction to consider claims not raised below by the alien even when the BIA reviews the claim sua sponte
  • holding that we lack jurisdiction to consider claims that have not been raised before the BIA
  • holding that we lack jurisdiction to consider a claim not raised before the BIA, even when the BIA sua sponte considers the claim
  • concluding that “we lack jurisdiction” to consider an argument not raised by petition to the Board
  • holding that we lack jurisdiction to review claims that were not raised in an appeal before the BIA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ina, Black, Hull

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.