Andrepont v. Lake Charles Harbor and Terminal Dist.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiff was entitled to receive his employer' s contributions to his state retirement system for the period he was discharged without cause
• “the [T]hird [C]ircuit [C]ourt of [A]ppeal found that an employee discharged without cause could sue for relief under both Article 2749 for future salaries, and La. R.S. § 23:631 et seq. for wages due at the termination of his employment, with penalties and attorney fees.”
• endorsing the view of Bartlett

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).