Skip to main content

Andren v. White-Rodgers Co.

Citations

  • 465 N.W.2d 102
  • 1991 Minn. App. LEXIS 47
  • 1991 WL 4035

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming summary judgment where evidence conclusively demonstrated that plaintiff knew and appreciated the danger of lighting a cigarette in the presence of liquid propane gas and knew and appreciated that there was a liquid propane gas leak in the basement
  • affirming summary judgment where evidence conclusively demonstrated that plaintiff knew and appreciated the danger of lighting a cigarette in the presence of liquid propane gas and knew and appreciated that there was a liquid propane gas leak in the basement
  • plaintiff assumed risk when he recognized the smell of LP gas and lit a cigarette anyway
  • “Andren’s lighting of a cigarette in a gas-filled room was a voluntary acceptance of a known danger”
  • noting statutory abolition of Rule in Minnesota
  • noting statutory abolition of Rule in Minnesota

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foley, Norton, Short

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Andren v. White-Rodgers Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.