Andren v. White-Rodgers Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming summary judgment where evidence conclusively demonstrated that plaintiff knew and appreciated the danger of lighting a cigarette in the presence of liquid propane gas and knew and appreciated that there was a liquid propane gas leak in the basement
• affirming summary judgment where evidence conclusively demonstrated that plaintiff knew and appreciated the danger of lighting a cigarette in the presence of liquid propane gas and knew and appreciated that there was a liquid propane gas leak in the basement
• plaintiff assumed risk when he recognized the smell of LP gas and lit a cigarette anyway
• “Andren’s lighting of a cigarette in a gas-filled room was a voluntary acceptance of a known danger”
• noting statutory abolition of Rule in Minnesota
• noting statutory abolition of Rule in Minnesota

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Andren v. White-Rodgers Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Andren v. White-Rodgers Co.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-11-27· cited 2×