Skip to main content
· 5/7/1959

Andreas v. California Milling Corp.

Citations

  • 170 Cal. App. 2d 228
  • 338 P.2d 560

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that excess policy did not afford coverage until primary coverage was exhausted and thus excess carrier had no duty to disclaim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fourt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.