Andreano v. Shinseki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming ALJ’s conclusion that claimant was not disabled; noting that she told her doctor that she was looking for work
• finding the vocational expert’s failure to provide complete information regarding the “inspector/checker position” to be “irrelevant” where the VE provided substantial evidence that there were significant numbers of charge account clerk positions in the national economy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).