Skip to main content
· 1/24/1989

Andrea Dworkin Priscilla Moree Judith Fouts v. Hustler Magazine Inc.

Citations

  • 867 F.2d 1188
  • 16 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1113
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 565
  • 1989 WL 3925

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Rule 12(c) and Rule 12(b)(6) motions differ in time of filing but are otherwise “functionally identical,” and applying the same standard of review
  • holding that Rule 12(c) and Rule 12(b)(6) motions differ in time of filing but are otherwise “functionally identical,” and applying the same standard of review
  • holding that Rule 12(c) and Rule 12(b)(6) motions differ in time of filing but are otherwise “functionally identical,” and applying the same standard of review
  • holding that courts must “exam- ine the facts surrounding the publication, the context in which the statements were made, and the nature of the language used”
  • holding that Rule 12(c) and Rule 12(b)(6) motions differ in 9 time of filing but are otherwise “functionally identical,” and applying the same standard of review
  • explaining that the “principle 16 difference” between Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 12(c) “is the time of filing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Leavy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.