Andrea C. v. Marcus K.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that superior court did not abuse its discretion by declining to apply collateral estoppel where father believed separate protective order would have “no impact” on his custody case
• “[W]e review the decision to apply collateral estoppel when its technical requirements are otherwise satisfied for abuse of discretion.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).