Andre Ricardo Bailey v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “the public is certainly interested in the prevention of enforcement of ordinances which may be unconstitutional”
• holding that Planned Parenthood and its Medical Director had standing to assert third-party rights (of women) as well as their own rights
• holding that there was no substantial harm in preventing city from enforcing ordinance that was likely to be found unconstitutional, as the state has no valid interest in enforcing an unconstitutional ordinance
• finding that the language of an ordinance targeting abortion providers “clearly contemplates that facilities such as the one operated by Planned Parenthood would be subject to application of the statute”
• finding irreparable harm in case where abortion clinic challenged ordinance on behalf of itself and its patients
• finding irreparable injury where plaintiff showed substantial likelihood of success on merits of constitutional challenge to abortion regulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).