Andre Jones v. Gary McCaughtry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that due process was not violated where the destroyed evidence was of only speculative exculpatory value
• considering due process claim concerning government’s duty to preserve possible evidence on federal habeas review
• “[T]o show bad faith, Petitioner must prove ‘official animus’ or a ‘conscious effort to suppress exculpatory evidence.’ ” (quoting United States v. Nesbitt, 852 F.2d 1502, 1520 (7th Cir. 1988))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).