Andre H. v. Ambach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing court reporter, but not plaintiffs attorney, to be present at a psychological exam when plaintiff had difficulty with the English language
• permitting presence of stenographer at psychiatric examination because plaintiff was not fluent in English and would have difficulty communicating with counsel about examination
• permitting presence of stenographer at psychiatric examination because plaintiff lacked fluency in English and would have difficulty communicating with counsel about examination
• permitting a stenographer to attend where subject’s education and language skills likely would limit his ability to communicate to his attorney what occurred during the examination
• permitting the presence of a court reporter at a psychiatric examination because the plaintiff was “not well educated, and more importantly, ha[d] difficulty with the English language”
• allowing a stenographer to be present at a psychiatric examination where it appeared that plaintiff, who was not fluent in English, would have difficulty communicating with his attorney

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).