Skip to main content
· 1/17/1995

Andre C. Derrington-Bey v. District of Columbia Department of Corrections

Citations

  • 39 F.3d 1224
  • 309 U.S. App. D.C. 132
  • 1994 WL 652290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Mere quotation of Rule 6(e) shows why it is inapplicable to Rule 59(e) motions. The period for filing a Rule 59(e) motion does not—in the words of Rule 6(e)— begin with `service of a notice.'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wald, Henderson, Randolph

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.